Comments on: GamePro’s EarthBound Review

By: Mother Fanatic

Mother Fanatic — Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:02:40 +0000

So many errors….. (I mean, COME ON!!!!) EarthBound is just a WONDERFUL game!!!!!! I’m guessing he just played less than an hour, and quit. People need to get more into the game, instead of playing EarthBound a bit, then abandoning it forever….

The enemy left a present! Inside the present, there was Earthbound! ….But Ness is carrying too much stuff. Abandon EarthBound? (NO) What will you throw away? (Picnic Lunch) Ness got EarthBound! Gained 200,000,000 exp. points!

By: gg

gg — Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:52:53 +0000

“Threet”? All I have to say is……………………
Thrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeettttt
Throooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooootttttttttt

By: Luke

Luke — Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:53:14 +0000

Wow, Now if i know what to read if i need a laugh.
I was the 799 person to vote no! SO close!

By: Mr.Saturn67865545423

Mr.Saturn67865545423 — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:33:06 +0000

The grafficts are SUPER MEGA AWSOME!!

By: Starman Super

Starman Super — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:19:35 +0000

wow, this guy fails. threet? really? someone had a little too much 100-proof when he wrote this

By: Kyoo

Kyoo — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:34:33 +0000

I remember, back in the day, this magazines reviews had strong influence. and it’s sad that the game got such a review. if I would have read this. I probably never would have played the game. (but it sounds like the reviewer didn’t either)

By: Steve!

Steve! — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:05:45 +0000

I’m assuming he got past onette but just stopped playing after since he didn’t seem liked he cared for the game much.

By: TBird

TBird — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:19:39 +0000

Hey it’s cool people still see this and comment on it every once in a while. I feel like I did my small part for the EB community, and all I did was hoard crap I should have tossed years ago.

Maybe I should have taken the time to get a better scan, but when I saw it was readable I was done.

Keep in mind folks, this was a section of the mag DEDICATED to rpgs. This was clearly written by someone who was not into rpgs and under a ridiculous deadline that shouldn’t have even been necessary for such a niche market.

By: Ninji

Ninji — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:53:49 +0000

There is a possibility that ‘Threet’ was what the localizers planned to change Threek into, or just that this guy had a hangover while writing this, personally I think that the EGM reviewer was better than this guy, I think Mato screwed up a whole bunch when he said that the GamePro review was better than the EGM one. At least that guy had the decency to PROOF-READ what he was WRITING.

By: Kirby Chimera

Kirby Chimera — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:31:45 +0000

I don’t think this moron ever got INTO Onett.